In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2820QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $547.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
