Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-2720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3107 days newer than Core i7-2720QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2720QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2720QM - 135 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2720QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2720QM | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |