In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2635QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 1 day newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 11 years and 1 day newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2635QM vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
57%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $494.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
