Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-14900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 83 days older than the more expensive Core i9-14900.
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900 - 222 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £326.49 vs £570.81
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900 - £1.47 vs £2.58 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£326.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £326.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700KF | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |