Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700F - 766 vs 584 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - £239.43 vs £326.49
- Up to 5% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-14700KF - £0.41 vs £0.43 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
766
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
95%
Price, £
£326.49
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for £326.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
76%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700KF | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |