The Core i7-13700F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only £192.75 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-13700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 66% cheaper – £98.22 vs £290.97
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-13700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-13700F vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
214
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, £
£290.97
33%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
43%
Core i7-13700F vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-13700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$359.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
30 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |