Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 560 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Core i7-11700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-11700F - 187 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - £267.90 vs £423.03
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-11700F - £1.43 vs £2.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £423.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£267.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £267.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-11700F | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |