Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10100 - 129 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - £100.20 vs £420.66
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-11700F - £0.82 vs £3.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
129
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.26/FPS
25%
Price, £
£420.66
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £420.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £100.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-11700F | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |