Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-11375H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 379 days newer than Core i7-11375H.
Advantages of Core i7-11375H
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i7-11375H - 215 vs 208 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-11375H | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |