Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-10750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 270 days older than Core i7-10750H.
Advantages of Core i7-10750H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10750H - 111 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10750H - 16 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£354.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £354.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6540 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10750H | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |