The Core i7-10700K is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 6800HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-10700K
The Ryzen 7 6800HS is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 6800HS
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 6800HS for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
99%
Min 1% FPS
127
99%
Price, £
£339.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 6800HS
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 6800HS in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 6800HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 6800HS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Ryzen 7 6800HS
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-10700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Rembrandt |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
