In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10700F is faster than the Ryzen 7 2700. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $232 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 days newer
Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 70% cheaper – $97.92 vs $329.95
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.36 vs $3.88/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 2700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
29%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
35%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
72 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
84%
Price, $
$97.92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 2700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 7 2700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 2700 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
