Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £239.54 vs £441.35
- Up to 42% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-13900K - £1.38 vs £2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-10700F - 187 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
93%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £239.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.36/FPS
58%
Price, £
£441.35
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for £441.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |