Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-6700 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £116.22 vs £239.56
- Up to 51% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-10700F - £0.68 vs £1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
49%
Price, £
£239.56
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4479 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
170
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£116.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £116.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4479 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |