Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - £239.56 vs £321.06
- Up to 18% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700 - £1.17 vs £1.43 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Core i7-10700F - 224 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1243 minutes ago
Buy for £321.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1242 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |