Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i7-10700 - 289 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - £435.39 vs £494.75
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700 - £1.51 vs £1.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £494.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6717 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£435.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6717 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |