Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 748 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Core i5-9400
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £109.97 vs £279.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5950X - £0.59 vs £1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400 - 203 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
187
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£109.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £109.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7418 minutes ago
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7417 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |