Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Core i5-9400
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £222.44 vs £307.67
- Up to 26% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700K - £1.10 vs £1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-9400 - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
202
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£222.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £222.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.48/FPS
74%
Price, £
£307.67
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for £307.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |