Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Core i5-8400
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £168.64 vs £1179.89
- Up to 82% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £1.51 vs £8.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400 - 137 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
112
82%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £168.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£8.61/FPS
18%
Price, £
£1179.89
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8400 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |