Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Core i5-8400
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £146.66 vs £229.26
- Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600K - £0.79 vs £1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - 215 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£146.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £146.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
74%
Price, £
£229.26
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for £229.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8400 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |