Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Core i5-7500
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500 - 147 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-7500 - £70.97 vs £169.41
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500 - £0.48 vs £1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-7500 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £169.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |