Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Core i5-7400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - £137.08 vs £552.48
- Up to 64% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - £2.49 vs £6.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Core i5-7400 - 80 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
55
69%
Value, £/FPS
£2.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£137.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £137.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.91/FPS
36%
Price, £
£552.48
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |