Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Core i5-7400
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £70.00 vs £115.66
- Up to 39% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-10600KF - £0.37 vs £0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-7400 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
61%
Price, £
£115.66
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £115.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400 | vs | Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |