Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i5-7300HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than Core i5-7300HQ.
Advantages of Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7300HQ - 472 vs 321 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
472
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7300HQ | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |