In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-7300HQ is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
