The Core i5-4690K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom X4 9650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4690K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 88 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
The Core i5-4690K is better in every way
Core i5-4690K vs Phenom X4 9650 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
89%
Min 1% FPS
110
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-4690K vs Phenom X4 9650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690K vs Phenom X4 9650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690K vs Phenom X4 9650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4690K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| $243.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
| Haswell | Codename | Agena |
88 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
