The Core i5-4670S is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4670S
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Core i5-4670S vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4670S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
94%
Min 1% FPS
114
95%
Price, £
£117.49
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Core i5-4670S vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670S vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670S vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4670S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
