Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3077 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Core i5-4670K
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £39.97 vs £260.26
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900KF - £0.17 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-4670K - 279 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
234
84%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
279
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.93/FPS
18%
Price, £
£260.26
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670K | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |