The Core i5-4670K is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-13100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4670K
The Core i3-13100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-13100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 60 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4670K vs Core i3-13100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183
90%
Min 1% FPS
122
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£110.97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Core i5-4670K vs Core i3-13100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i3-13100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670K vs Core i3-13100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4670K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |