In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4250U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 3700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4250U vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4250U vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4250U vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4250U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4250U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM4 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
