Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Core i5-3470T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £38.95 vs £346.39
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-13700K - £0.09 vs £0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 63% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3470T - 747 vs 457 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
457
61%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£38.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9848 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
747
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
20%
Price, £
£346.39
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |