In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3450 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $312 cheaper!
Core i5-3450
- Up to 77% cheaper – $95.00 vs $407.00
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.53 vs $3.20/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 9 7900
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
49%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
48%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$407
23%
Value, $/FPS
$3.2/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
