The Core i5-3450 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom II X4 820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3450
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 77 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Phenom II X4 820
The Core i5-3450 is better in every way
Core i5-3450 vs Phenom II X4 820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Phenom II X4 820
Sep 1st, 2009
Average FPS
164
96%
Min 1% FPS
111
97%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-3450 vs Phenom II X4 820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Phenom II X4 820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Phenom II X4 820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Phenom II X4 820
Sep 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3450 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom II X4 820 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
$174.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Deneb |
77 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |