In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3380M is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6 – 131 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3380M vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
131 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3380M vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3380M vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3380M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3380M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
