In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3230M is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 2 days newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 2 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3230M vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
38%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
39%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3230M vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3230M vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3230M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
