In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2500K is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 3900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Ryzen 9 3900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Ryzen 9 3900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Ryzen 9 3900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$216.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
