Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 83 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-14600K.
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £227.97 vs £499.98
- Up to 54% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900F - £0.76 vs £1.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-14600K - 304 vs 300 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
300
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£227.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £227.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
304
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
46%
Price, £
£499.98
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14600K | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |