Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 344 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-12100F - 463 vs 454 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - £70.97 vs £237.88
- Up to 69% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13500 - £0.16 vs £0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-13500 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £237.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13500 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |