In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-13400F is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-8700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
82 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
77%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$196.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
