Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i5-13400E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 426 days older than Core i5-13400E.
Advantages of Core i5-13400E
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-13400E - 206 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400E - 24 vs 16 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£257.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £257.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7037 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400E | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |