Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100.
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-12100 - 200 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - £98.57 vs £166.44
- Up to 39% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600KF - £0.51 vs £0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
61%
Price, £
£166.44
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for £166.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600KF | vs | Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |