Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-12400 - 294 vs 265 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £428.87 vs £2511.32
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-12400 - £1.46 vs £9.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£428.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £428.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |