Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 315 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600KF - 209 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - £70.00 vs £214.98
- Up to 68% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600KF - £0.33 vs £1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 58 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £214.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6718 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6718 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |