In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-11600K is slower than the Core i9-14900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $371 cheaper!
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 65% cheaper – $199.00 vs $569.99
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.01 vs $4.41/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-14900
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6 – 129 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600K vs Core i9-14900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
99 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
76%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600K vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600K vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$262.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
