Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £201.30 vs £433.50
- Up to 51% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-14900K - £0.36 vs £0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-11600 - 597 vs 558 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
558
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£201.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
597
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
49%
Price, £
£433.5
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |