Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £201.30 vs £499.98
- Up to 49% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900F - £0.43 vs £0.84 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11600 - 593 vs 464 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
464
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£201.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
593
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
51%
Price, £
£499.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5108 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |