Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £201.30 vs £257.13
- Up to 18% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-12900KF - £1.41 vs £1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-11600 - 150 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£201.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.71/FPS
82%
Price, £
£257.13
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for £257.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |