Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i5-11400H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 238 days newer than Core i5-11400H.
Advantages of Core i5-11400H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11400H - 210 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 24 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400H | vs | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
