Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF and the cheaper Core i5-11400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i5-11400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £142.04 vs £462.65
- Up to 69% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900KF - £0.50 vs £1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-11400 - 287 vs 283 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
283
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£142.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
31%
Price, £
£462.65
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for £462.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400 | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |