Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Core i5-10600
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - £224.50 vs £326.15
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-14700KF - £0.39 vs £0.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600 - 766 vs 580 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
580
76%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £224.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7201 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
766
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
91%
Price, £
£326.15
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for £326.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7200 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |